On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:04:00 -0500 (CDT) David W Tamkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's distinguish between rights and abilities and avoid language > subject to misunderstanding as referring to one instead of the > other. Aye, I like your wording better. You've accurately caught the salient points and clarified them. -- J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ --=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
- Re: "copyright but not control" Tom Neff
- Re: "copyright but not control" Peter Galbavy
- Re: "copyright but not control" Tom Neff
- Re: "copyright but not control" Stan Ryckman
- Re: "copyright but not control" J C Lawrence
- Re: "copyright but not control" J C Lawrence
- Re: "copyright but not control" Norbert Bollow
- Re: "copyright but not control" David W. Tamkin
- Re: "copyright but not control" Tom Neff
- Re: "copyright but not control" JC Dill
- Re: "copyright but not control" J C Lawrence
- Re: "copyright but not control" J C Lawrence
- Re: "copyright but not control" J C Lawrence
