On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:51:10 -0700 Michelle Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I'm the original poster and none of the respondents came > across to me as believing that demime is the only solution. I've come to prefer mimefilter: Its simpler Its faster Its lighter weight Its easier/simpler to configure Oh yeah, and it has a Debian/Linux package and the author appears semi-regularly on the Mailman lists. ObNote: Oy heah, its also less featured, but in ways I didn't and don't care about. -- J C Lawrence )\._.,--....,'``. ---------(*) /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. [EMAIL PROTECTED] `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Oh Freddled Gruntbuggly
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Tom Neff
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Charlie Summers
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker John R Levine
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Michelle Dick
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Charlie Summers
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Michelle Dick
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Tom Neff
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker David W. Tamkin
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Michelle Dick
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker J C Lawrence
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Nick Simicich
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Nick Simicich
- Re: wanted: web-based plain-text email checker Tim Pierce
