David W. Tamkin wrote: > In another post, which I've mistakenly deleted, Roger said how top-posting > was acceptable on many of the lists running on his service, because almost > none of the time do people have any reason to review the preceding message(s) > in the thread. Like all arguments offered in favor of top-posting, that's > really an argument against quoting at all, isn't it?
No, because it's a service to the 5-10% who *do* need to be reminded of the context.
