Thomas Gramstad wrote: > > >X-No-Archive-List: is too similar to X-No-Archive-List:. They >would be confused with each other. Also, X-No-Archive-List: is >not accurate: some of us want to allow private archives (available >only for the users of a particular machine, organization or >intranet), but not public ones. Perhaps X-No-Public-Archive-List: >would work. >
Besides, wouldn't it make more sense as X-List-No-Public-Archive: -- that is, put it in the List-* namespace?
