On 02:44 PM 8/19/02, Nick Simicich wrote: >At 11:15 AM 2002-08-19 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > > >>On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:38 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote: >>>Actually I believe that such a responsibility exists only where >>>the list-owners want the situation to be different from the default >>>that is implied by copyright law, namely: >>> >>>* Without explicit permission, no-one is allowed to mirror the list, >>> or create public archives. > >1. There are two issues here. One is the individual poster's implied >permission. It is my belief that, barring a statement that changes >expectations, that the original posted has not implied that their posting >can be copied to archives other than the ones that are associated with the >list mechanics.
Sure they have. I have a complete archive of list-managers on my hard drive, including your posts. You SENT them to me (via the list), so clearly you gave me permission to have a copy and to keep it. >Someone who establishes an external archive is violating my collection >copyright, as well as violating the copyrights of the individual authors. How is my making my archive available for others to see any different than a library making a magazine subscription available for others to see (read or borrow)? jc
