> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Paul M. Moriarty > > In which of these cases was the provider sued for damages? > Unless I'm missing something I fail to see the relevance to > stating that a provider can be held liable for damages.
There are costs other than damages. Unless the suit is held to be not only unworthy but frivolous, you're out the legal costs, and who can afford that?
