Richard and all,
Not to worry Richard, I doubt that no one except Patrick is suspicious
of you representing NSI. Patrick has on what appears on too many
occasions accused others of many things falsely. This seems to be
a disturbing and unfortunate tendency that he possess....
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 08:28 PM 1/23/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> >On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Craig Simon wrote:
> >
> >> Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> >> > Perhaps if you were aware that NSI has sponsored one or more of Richard's
> >> > trips to the IFWP meetings last year you woulde better appreciate
> >> > Richard's defense of NSI.
> >>
> >> That's news to me. Tell me more please.
> >
> >That's all the news there is on this matter. The reason for my posting
> >this tidbit is that I was annoyed to seeing a defense of NSI's position
> >posted as a seemingly "objective argument," especially when the only other
> >party I have seen defending NSI's position are representitives of NSI.
>
> I am not, nor have I ever been, a representative of Network Solutions.
>
> --
> "That's why there is a Protocol SO. To decide what the next
> number after 16 is." - Dixon (tinc)
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
