Go figure,
The IFWP list just came back on line.
That does not change my message however.
We need a list of record. The IFWP has
acted as a central discussion list, but
it has not been sanctioned as such by
ICANN.
And more importantly, it has experienced
continuing problems. People can't find
instructions on how to sign up, people
can't always sign up when they do find
the obscure instructions, and the list
operation has been sporadic at best.
These problems must be solved before
we enter the public comment period.
IMHO & FWIW,
Jay.
At 1/27/99, 11:24 AM, Jay Fenello wrote:
>
>Hello Esther,
>
>As we approach the public comment period
>on the various proposals expected by ICANN,
>the Internet community is left without a
>mailing list of record -- the IFWP list
>is dead!
>
>This is unacceptable!!!
>
>To accommodate the discussions surrounding
>the PSO, ASO, DNSO, and MAC proposals, I
>humbly suggest that ICANN host a generic
>policy list ASAP.
>
>At the very least, ICANN should designate
>a single external list as the list of record.
>I suspect that ORSC and others would be happy
>to host such a list, and could have one
>operational within 24 hours.
>
>This needs to be addressed quickly. To
>do otherwise is inconsistent with the open
>process requirements of the White Paper.
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Jay Fenello
>President, Iperdome, Inc.
>404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
>
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
