Agreed.
Steve Page
>
>We shouldn't allow this move toward private self-regulation to cause us
>to lose the hard-won gains of openness and transparency guaranteed by the
>Freedom of Information Act. Perhaps we'll need an exception for private
>personnel matters, but everything related to policy-making ought to go up
>on the web and stay up.
>
>I think there ought to be consensus on this. Anyone disagree?
>
> -- Bret
>
>Jock Gill wrote:
>>Please make sure that any DNS solution includes fundamentals such as:
>>
>>Open Meetings
>>Records management requirements -- throw nothing out.
>>Freedom of Information Act access to all records [FOIA]
>>Prompt electronic publishing of ALL _public_ documents [same day = prompt]
>>
>>If these rules are good enough for government agencies, they are good
>>enough for
>>ICANN, DNSO etc.
>>
>>If these rules are rejected, it is another argument that the rejecting
>>organizations are NOT about the good of the public.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Jock
>
>__________________________________________________
>To receive the digest version instead, send a
>blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>___END____________________________________________
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
