Hmmmm....who put WIPO "in charge," Dave?
ICANN's being "in charge" of administration of the root does not mean that it has
unlimited powers and that it can ignore or usurp the legitimate rights of
existing registries.
--MM
Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 10:13 PM 1/30/99 -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
> This gives the registry a property right in its operations and does not allow
> >ICANN or WIPO to usurp it. I would feel happier if the dnso's charter also
>
> "usurp"?
>
> so the idea is to put an organization in charge... but not really.
>
> interesting construct.
>
> d/
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker Tel: +60 (19) 3299 445
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Post Office Box 296, U.P.M.
> Serdang, Selangor 43400 MALAYSIA
> Brandenburg Consulting
> <http://www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1 (408) 246 8253
> Fax: +1(408)273 6464 675 Spruce Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
