At 4:18 PM -0500 1/31/99, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>It is quite amazing to me that people seem to not be reading what I
>proposed for 10 constituencies. I continue to see statements that NO
>contituency proposals include ANY PUBLIC INTEREST SEGMENT. And yet,
>my 10 contituency proposal clearly does include one;-)...
I'm sorry Stef. I should have been more clear. I meant of the current
full blown drafts out there, none include a public interest segment. Your
constituency proposal is certainly interesting. I would prefer it to any
proposals besides flat membership.
>
>Also, I must say that I am equally interested on the NO Constituency
>model and the MANY CONSTITUENCY model, but not interested in anything
>in between. I am not welded to either proposal, but if we are going
>to have any constituencies, then I claim we need many.
Agreed.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
