Roeland,
{ Such round-robin DNS games is fine for load distribution among
{ different servers in a cluster and all content is the same company.
{ However, you'll
{ never find a marketing person who will agree to that, nor any other
{ business person. I want www.mhsc.com to come up with MY site
{ ALL the time, every time. You suggestion will break commercial use
{ of the Internet.
{
Would you be averse to being a portal for the others? To forming a co-op
to share operational costs?
Greg,
{ The reason I made the suggestion was to demonstrate to some people
{ on the list that a technology might support a certain type of use, but
{if significant numbers of people won't use that technology that way, it
{ won't be used.
Whoo! Isnt this not just the problem in DNS, but right here, where the
arguments are endless about 'only possible solutions,' and totally ignore
the reality that the list itself can only *persuade 'significant (numbers
of) people' to any solution at all?
---------
Earlier, y'all had written:
{ >> The
{ >>only solution possible is that trademark law can not apply to DNS
{ >>entries a priori. They must be adjudicated ad hoc.
{ >
{ >Actually, one may have multiple references for the same name. People
{ >do it all the time. My company has several IP addresses for its web
{ >site, that are offered in a round-robin manner for load sharing.
{ >
