[ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

[Roberto Gaetano]

Karl,

You wrote:
> If trademark is included then we also need the other valid groups who use
> names outside of trademark:
> 
>       Small businesses
> 
>       Local businesses
> 
>       Churches
> 
>       Schools
> 
>       Charitable groups
> 
>       Amateur sports teams
> 
>       Writers
> 
>       Parents naming children
> 
>       People naming pets, objects, computers, or anything
> 
>       etc
> 
> In other words, everybody.
> 
Fine.
Do you have a business case for it? Do you really think that "amateur sports
teams", for instance, have been so influential in the history of DNS wars as
Trademarks? If yes, join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and propose it.
You may have consensus on it ;>)

(besides this, I think you would make a great addition to the DNSO.ORG
process anyhow)

Regards
Roberto



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________