i would greatly appreciate someone directing me to the most current draft of
the application jay is referring to. i have been looking for it for the last
24-36 hours and am unable to locate it.

i looked on the ORSC site and am only able to view ver.5 dated 2/1 which
could not reflect the paris meeting held 2/2-3

thank you

ken stubbs
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Paris Meeting


At 1/29/99, 11:21 PM, Jay Fenello wrote:
>
>Hi Stef and Bret,
>
>I've gotten very little info so far.
>
>The meeting appears to be organized by one
>of the ccTLDs. The only meeting agenda that
>I have seen is the one I posted. Here is
>the participants list as of Friday:
>
>CENTR, APTLD, NSI, CORE, ORSC, ICC, IATLD
>
>Of course, I'll provide a complete summary
>after the meeting (possibly during, if I
>have the time and the connectivity).


Hello Everyone,

The result of yesterday's meeting in Paris was a
broad based consensus document that featured input
from representatives from all of the groups listed
above.

We started with the original ORSC/AIP draft, and
merged it with the latest comments from CENTRE. For
the most part, the changes we made were minor, and
consistent with philosophy underlying the original.

We did make one substantial change to the highly
controversial flat membership model.  After a long
and involved discussion, we came up with a self
forming constituency model.  It allows for up to
21 different constituencies that are fluid and
self defining.

While I have more to say about the meeting and
the process, I wanted to make the "Paris Draft"
available for comment as soon as possible.

As before, your comments are encouraged:

Jay.

===========

Paris Draft
February 4, 1999

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The name of this supporting organization shall be "The Domain Name
Supporting
Organization" (hereafter, "DNSO"). It shall be established by resolution of
the
Board of Directors  of ICANN and shall become a functioning part of ICANN.
These Rules provide guidance for the operation and management of the DNSO.

The DNSO is a consensus based policy advisory body within the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN"). The DNSO structure is
based on a General Assembly, a Names Council and a set of constituencies.
The
objectives for DNSO are as defined in article VI of the ICANN bylaws; that
is,
to develop and recommend substantive policies and procedures regarding TLDs,
including operation, assignment and management of the domain name system and
other related subjects.

The proposed DNSO will not be a legal entity in its own right, but will be a
component of the ICANN corporation. It will be an advisory body rather than
a
decision making body, without operational responsibility and with a minimal
budget (which will be funded by ICANN). The DNSO shall have no role in
funding
ICANN.

The starting point for discussions within the DNSO will be that current
registries operate under current RFCs. The purpose of the DNSO will be to
provide a fair process, taking into account both historical relationships
and
the need for change, to evolve any new rules.

Entities and individuals may participate in DNSO work, and they are invited
to
do so.

2.0 MEMBERSHIP

2.1 Membership.

It is expected that ICANN will have individual and corporate and
organizational
membership. Any ICANN member with expertise or interest in domain name
issues
may join the DNSO General Assembly by submitting a membership application.

2.2 The General Assembly.

The General Assembly is an open body of individuals and corporations and
organizations with a knowledge of and an interest in issues pertaining to
achievement of DNSO objectives, who are willing to contribute time, effort
and
expertise in DNSO work items, including discussion of work items, work item
proposal and development, draft document preparation, participation in
working
groups and steering committees. The General Assembly is an open, consensus
based assembly, process oriented rather than member oriented. General
Assembly
conference costs shall be covered by an equitable charge on attendees and
conferences and meetings shall be held online whenever possible.

2.3 The Names Council.

The Names Council is the Steering Committee for the DNSO, elected through
the
constituencies from the General Assembly as described below and responsible
for
facilitation, administration and management of consensus building for each
of
the DNSO processes. Consensus based and  researched and documented DNSO
policy
and standards proposals shall be forwarded to ICANN through Names Council
recommendations. The Names Council shall conduct its business and hold
election
for its members in accord with the provisions set forth below.


2.4 One Vote.

Each member of the General Assembly shall be  entitled to one vote.

2.5 Resignations.

Any member may resign its membership at any time.. Resignation shall take
effect immediately unless some other date is specified. The acceptance of a
resignation will not be necessary to make it effective. .

3.0 THE NAMES COUNCIL

3.1 Overview and Purpose.

The Names Council shall facilitate cooperation and consensus on policies
regarding the Domain Names System and related subjects, and, in accordance
with
Article VI, Section 3(a)(ii) of the Corporation's Bylaws, the Names Council
shall forward recommendations on such subjects to the Board of ICANN. The
Names
Council shall seek input and review of any proposed recommendations from all
Members. The processes of the Names Council shall be open and transparent
and
non-discriminatory.

3.2 Composition.

The Names Council shall be selected by means of the following process:

a. Members of the General Assembly shall self-organize into diverse
constituencies. No member shall be a member of more than one constituency.
The
initial constituencies shall be recognized by the ICANN Board based on the
following criteria:

1. Constituencies other than the constituency representing registries, shall
represent at least 5% of the members of the General Assembly.

2. Constituencies shall be open to membership without regard to geographic
location.

3. Constituencies shall adopt open and transparent processes that comply
with
these Rules and the ICANN Bylaws.

4. Constituencies shall not be formed or recognized insofar as they are
based
on geographic location, religious affiliation, governmental affiliation, or
membership in any particular corporation or organization.

b. Each recognized constituency shall select three (3) members to sit on the
Names Council, no two of whom may come from the same region (as defined in
the
ICANN bylaws).

c. In the event that the Names Council so selected does not include a member
from any particular region, members of the General Assembly resident in such
region shall select an additional Name Council Member from such region.

d. Following recognition of the initial constituencies, additional
qualifying
constituencies shall be recognized by the Names Council. Otherwise,
recognition, deletion and merger of constituencies shall be effected by fair
procedures established by the Names Council.

e. Members of the Names Council shall be subject to recall by a two-thirds
vote
of the members of the constituency that selected them.


3.3 Chair of the Names Council.

The Names Council Chair will be selected by the Names Council at or before
the
first meeting in each year after a Names Council election; when selected the
Chair would lose his or her personal vote in the Names Council To ensure
fair
voting, Names Council Chair would only have a casting (tie-breaking) vote.
The
Chair of the Names Council shall act as the Chair of the General Assembly.

3.4 Conduct of Business.

The Names Council shall meet regularly on a schedule determined by its
members,
but not less than 4 times per year. Unless otherwise provided, a majority
vote
of the members attending a Names Council meeting at which a quorum
(consisting
of two thirds of the Name Council Members) is present or otherwise enabled
to
vote shall be sufficient for the conduct of its business.

3.5 Meeting Forums.

At least once a year, the Names Council shall meet in person at a location
agreed by its members. All other meetings of the Names Council may take
place
in person, by telephone, video, internet, any other efficient form of
electronic conferencing, or by a combination of the aforementioned modes of
communication.

3.6 Meeting Minutes.

At each meeting, the members of the Names Council shall appoint a scribe to
take notes and prepare minutes of the meeting.  Subject to the provisions of
Paragraph 3.0 below, the Names Council shall post minutes of its meeting to
the
DNSO web site within 2 business days after the meeting has concluded.

3.7 Open Meetings.

Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 3.9 below, all meetings of the Names
Council shall be open to all DNSO members. Members will be welcome to
observe
in-person meetings and, to the extent technically and financially
practicable,
listen to all other meetings.

3.8 Names Council - Voting on Record

The Names Council shall record in its minutes the position and expressed
views
of every Names Council member on every Names Council action.

3.9 Executive Sessions of Names Council.

When necessary and appropriate to protect the confidentiality of any matter
before it, the Names Council may elect to hold an Executive Session, which
shall be closed to all persons other than Names Council representatives.  By
way of example and not by way of limitation, it may be appropriate for the
Names Council to hold Executive Sessions to discuss personnel matters. In
any
such case, the general subject matter of such a closed session, and the
rationale for holding the discussion in private, shall be disclosed.

3.10 Names Council Meeting Attendance Requirement.

In order to ensure a continuously active Names Council, elected members  who
miss either (a) three consecutive Names Council meetings or (b) more than
25%
of the meetings in any single year, shall be dropped from the Names Council
in
the absence of extenuating circumstances. In the event that a member is
dropped, the constituency shall choose a new representative.

3.11 Conduct of Names Council Meetings.

Robert's Rules of Order (Revised), or for electronic meetings such similar
rules as shall be selected by the Names Council, shall govern the conduct of
Names Council meetings.

4.0 NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF ICANN BOARD MEMBERS

4.1 Elections Committee.

The Names Council shall appoint an Elections Committee each year, which
shall
consist of a Chair and four or more members of the General Assembly, not
more
than half of whom may be sitting members of the Names Council. The Elections
Committee shall oversee the election of the DNSO's representatives on the
ICANN
Board of Directors and provide such other assistance as requested by the
President.

4.2 Nomination by Petition.

The Elections Committee Chair shall call for nominations by petition for the
ICANN Director positions from the General Assembly in an e-mail to all
members
and in an announcement posted on the DNSO web site. The announcement will
include procedures for nominations by petition and will be made at least 30
days prior to the mailing or distribution of ballots. A petition nominating
a
DNSO member meeting the eligibility requirements and supported by the
identifiable signatures of at least 50 members of the General Assembly shall
automatically place that member's name on the slate of nominees, provided
such
petition is received by the Elections Committee Chair within 30 days after
the
call for nominations.  Such petitions must be submitted with the knowledge
and
agreement of the nominee.

4.3   Election Procedures

In the case that more candidates are proposed than there are vacancies for
DNSO
nominations to the Board, the positions will be filled using a method such
as
single transferable voting as selected by the Names Council.  The DNSO
nominees
to the ICANN Board will have staggered terms of office to ensure continuity.
Election to the staggered terms shall follow the method set forth in Section
4.6 below.

4.4 Eligibility.

Any member of the General Assembly in good standing, not serving as a member
of
the Names Council or the Elections Committee and not otherwise disqualified,
is
eligible for election to the ICANN Board of Directors.

4.5 Ballots and Voting.

The Elections Committee Chair shall provide the names of the nominees,
biographical overviews, and individual position statements for preparation,
mailing, and tallying of ballots to all members of the General Assembly.
The
Elections Committee shall use whatever means it deems appropriate and
accurate
to distribute, collect and tally ballots.

4.6 Election.

The candidate(s) receiving the highest number of votes shall be elected to
fill
the DNSO seats  on ICANN's Board of Directors.  For the initial election,
the
person receiving the most votes shall be elected to fulfill the three-year
term, the person receiving the next highest number of votes shall be elected
to
fulfill the two-year term, and the person receiving the third highest number
of
votes shall be elected to fulfill the one-year term.

4.7 Notification of Election Results.

Immediately upon receiving the election results, the Elections Committee
Chair
shall notify all candidates, the DNSO's Officers, Names Council members, the
membership of the DNSO, and the Chair of ICANN's Board of Directors.

4.8 Removal of Board Members.

If, in the opinion of the Names Council, a member of the ICANN Board elected
by
the DNSO is no longer capable of fulfilling his or her responsibilities, or
is
no longer operating in the best interest of the DNSO, the Names Council may,
by
2/3 vote, call a Special Referendum of the Membership asking for removal of
that Board member. Such a Special Referendum may also be called by means of
a
petition signed by at least 25% of the members of the General Assembly. If
2/3rds of the General Assembly votes cast favor  removal, and that a quorum
of
at least ten percent of the membership of the General Assembly have voted,
the
Board Member will then be removed.

In the event of removal of one or more DNSO elected members of the ICANN
Board,
the Names Council will appoint one or more members (who is/are not also
currently serving on the Names Council), as a temporary measure. A 2/3rds
vote
of the Names Council shall be necessary for such appointment. The Names
Council
will then immediately seek nominations from the General Assembly or a
replacement to serve out the remainder of the removed Board member's term.
No
Board member who has been removed will be eligible for nomination. A Special
Election of the Membership shall be held as soon as practicable from the
nominees submitted to the Names Council.

5.0 RESEARCH PROCESS

5.1 Reports and Recommendations.

When requested by ICANN or upon its own initiative, the DNSO, through the
Names
Council, shall submit to ICANN a Report and Recommendation which shall
contain
the policy recommendations of the DNSO. The process for initiating
consideration of a specific issue may be begun at the request of any three
members of the Names Council or by means of a petition signed by at least 5%
of
the members of the General Assembly. Reports and Recommendations made by the
DNSO to ICANN shall be made by the process set forth in this Section 5.

5.2 Research Committees.

For each matter upon which the DNSO begins consideration with respect to a
recommendation to ICANN, there shall be a Research Committee which will
consider the relevant issues, research the ramifications of particular
actions
or inaction, review the comments and criticisms received by interested
individuals and experts, hold hearings on the issues before it (unless there
is
a consensus among the members of the Research Committee that such hearings
are
not necessary), attempt to reach consensus on the correct resolution of the
issue, and draft and revise any Report and Recommendation.

5.3 Composition of Research Committees.

Each Research Committee shall be composed of General Assembly members
including
at least two members of the Names Council not from the same constituency and
members of the General Assembly. In selecting members of a Research
Committee,
the Names Council shall be guided by the need to ensure regional diversity
and
the desire for professional and business experience, technical expertise,
and
insights from affected parties  on the matters presented.

5.4 Expansion of Research Committee Membership.

If, at any time, the members of any Research Committee feels that they need
additional expertise or counsel on the issues before them, they may, in
their
discretion and by a majority vote of the committee's members, expand their
membership by adding new committee members from the General Assembly or from
outside the DNSO with the requisite experience or background.

5.5 Issue Statement.

After its members are appointed, each Research Committee shall meet to
discuss
the issue(s) with which it has been presented, prepare a timetable for the
drafting of, and comments and revisions to, the Report and Recommendation,
and
draft an Issue Statement.  The Issue Statement shall fairly frame the
issue(s)
on which the Report and Recommendation shall be made to ICANN, and whenever
practicable, provide an overview of various positions and possible outcomes.
The Research Committee shall promptly post its proposed timetable and Issue
Statement to the DNSO website and invite comments from the General Assembly.

5.6 Comment Period and Open Meeting.

The Research Committee shall review all comments submitted in response to
the
Issue Statement and shall schedule an Open Meeting of the General Assembly
at
which interested persons can make additional statements and discuss the
issues
presented with the Research Committee.  Notice of the Open Hearing shall be
posted on the DNSO web site at least 30 days in advance, and the Research
Committee shall endeavor, to the extent feasible and practicable, to permit
participation by telephone or videoconference. The Research Committee may
hold
additional Open Meetings, if warranted.

5.7 First Request for Comments.

The Research Committee shall review all comments submitted in response to
the
Issue Statement and consider the statements made and discussions held at the
Open Hearing and shall draft a Report and Recommendation containing the
tentative conclusions of the Research Committee, along with a detailed
statement of reasons why it has reached its tentative conclusion.  This
draft
Report and Recommendation shall be posted to the DNSO website in the form of
a
"First Request for Comments."

5.8 Fair Hearing Petition.

If, after the First Request for Comments is published, any person,
corporation,
or organization (the "Petitioner") feels that the proposal outlined by the
Research Committee either (i) places an unfair burden on the Petitioner's
personal, business, or organizational interests, or (ii) is not in the best
interests of the domain name system, the Petitioner may request a Fair
Hearing.
Each Petition for a Fair Hearing shall include (i) a detailed statement of
the
harm that would be caused if the proposal contained in the Request for
Comments
was adopted as policy; (ii) a specific reference to the language in the
Request
for Comments that would lead to the alleged harm; (iii) a specific proposal
for
new or modified language that would alleviate or minimize the alleged harm;
and
(iv) a statement of the Petitioner's professional or business interests that
would be impacted in any way by the adoption of its proposed language. The
Research Committee may either adopt the Petitioner's suggested language or
hold
a Fair Hearing.

5.9 Implementation Preview

In addition to filing a Fair Hearing Petition, any member of the Registry
constituency which may be required to implement a proposed policy pursuant
to a
contract with ICANN may ask, after the First Request for Comments is issued,
that such proposed policy recommendation undergo an implementation preview
from
the registries. The Names Council shall establish an implementation preview
process that will determine whether a substantial plurality (3/4ths) of
those
registries which vote support such implementation or are or will be
contractually committed to do so. Policies that do not meet this criteria
shall
not be forwarded to ICANN by the DNSO or adopted by ICANN.  Registries
participating in the implementation preview shall collaborate to submit a
timely report on their actions and views, including a record of the vote of
each registry, to the Names Council.

5.10 Fair Hearing.

A Fair Hearing required by Sections 5.8 or 5.11 shall allow the Research
Committee and the Petitioner, its representatives and supporters to discuss
and
debate the issues raised in the Fair Hearing Petition. Fair Hearings shall
be
open to all DNSO members. The purpose of the Fair Hearing shall be to seek
consensus on the issues raised. After a Fair Hearing has been held, the
Research Committee shall report on the DNSO web site whether consensus was
reached, and if so, what was agreed by those present. Fair Hearings shall be
open in the same manner as Names Council meetings.

5.11  Further Review of Changes

Whenever a proposal has been changed as a result of the preceding processes,
any changes resulting from such processes shall be republished on the DNSO
website and subject to review under the prior provisions of this section.

5.12 Report to the Names Council.

After reviewing all comments submitted in response to a proposal , the
Research
Committee shall prepare a Report and Recommendation for the Names Council.
This Report and Recommendation will be posted promptly to the DNSO web site.

5.13 Names Council Action.

After a Report and Recommendation is submitted to it, the Names Council
shall
reach a judgment as to whether there is a likelihood of consensus in the
General Assembly in support of the proposal.  In such case, the Names
Council
shall submit a Report and Recommendation to the General Assembly membership
for
ratification; if this is done, the Report and Recommendation shall be
forwarded
to the Elections Committee Chair, who shall arrange for a ratification vote.
A
Report and Recommendation shall be deemed ratified by the DNSO General
Assembly
if two-thirds  of those casting ballots vote in favor of the Report and
Recommendation. Each Report and Recommendation ratified by the General
Assembly
shall be forwarded by the Names Council to the ICANN Board and shall include
the full research record.


6.0. ACCESS TO INFORMATION

6.1 Minutes and Reports.

The DNSO shall publish, at least annually, a report describing its
activities.
Draft minutes of all DNSO meetings shall be published no later than 48
hours.
The Names Council at its next regular meeting will formally approve minutes.
All minutes, meetings, materials, and communications of the DNSO (and any
committees thereof) shall be made publicly available immediately following
approval by the Names Council.

6.2 DNSO Web Site.

The Names Council shall post on the public World Wide Web Site:

(a) Periodically a calendar of scheduled meetings for the upcoming year, and

(b) in advance of each DNSO meeting or policy-recommendation proceeding, a
notice of the fact and time that such meeting or proceeding will be held
and,
to the extent known an agenda for the meeting. If reasonably practicable the
Names Council shall post notices of special meetings of the DNSO and of the
Names Council at least fourteen (14) days prior to the meetings.

6.3 On-line Participation

To ensure international and diverse participation, the proceedings of the
DNSO
and the Names Council, as well as all Committees of the DNSO, including
voting,
shall to the fullest extent possible, be conducted on-line. The DNSO shall
establish appropriate mailing lists to directly notify members of its
actions.


7.0 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Any action by the Names Council in which a Names Council member is
personally
and directly interested, shall be valid, provided (i) the fact of such
interest
is previously disclosed or known to the Names Council, and (ii) the Names
Council shall nevertheless authorize, approve and ratify such action at a
meeting of the Names Council by a vote of a majority of the members present,
such interested member or members to be counted in determining whether a
quorum
is present, but not to be counted in calculating the majority of such quorum
necessary to carry such vote.

8.0 INDEMNIFICATION

The ICANN shall indemnify all Names Council members and those working as
agents
of the DNSO of ICANN for acts within their respective authorities to the
full
extent permitted by the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law of the State of
California.

9.0 ADOPTION

These DNSO Rules shall be adopted by the ICANN as part of its By-laws and/or
board resolutions.

--------------------------------

                                APPENDIX


A. Term of office of Names Council Members.

Names Council representatives shall be elected by their constituencies and
terms of office shall be staggered for continuity.  The term of office shall
normally be of three years.

One third of the membership of the initial Names Council must retire after
one
year in office, and another one-third of the membership after a second year.
The rotation of members selected by particular constituencies shall be
determined by the number of votes received. The person receiving the most
votes
shall be elected to fulfill the three-year term, the person receiving the
next
highest number of votes shall be elected to fulfill the two-year term, and
the
person receiving the third highest number of votes shall be elected to
fulfill
the one-year term.


Respectfully,

Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.
404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com


Reply via email to