>>
>>Any rules which automatically require a user to ceritify they will not use
>this
>>name to violate a trademark is a violation of their fundamental rights.
>
>That would be the fundamental right to violate other people's rights?
How can use of a character string that someone else just happened to
trademark, when used for a non commercial or other non infringing purpose,
possibly be a violation of rights? Why should a trademark holder feel they
have a "right" to control any and all uses of a character string above and
beyond what any laws grant them?
