At 01:17 AM 2/15/99 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>On 15-Feb-99 Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>> Not necessarily. Given sufficient resources and careful crafting of
>> requirements, all things are implement able. It is largely a matter of
>> cost/effectiveness. IOW, is the solution larger than the problem? To answer
>> that, one must first define the problem. We haven't done that yet. We know
>> what the legal/political problem is, but we really don't know what the
>> technical problems are until we start working possible solution-sets for
>> the legal/political problem. Since the problem is primarily legal, that
>> must be worked first. Technical and logistical issues only work to
>> constrain the solution-set.
>
>How is the problem primarily legal? I think this is a case of cart before the
>horse, really.
>
>The problem is primarly technical.
hammer.problem.nail.
Requirements are not technical, implementation is. We are not discussing
implementation just yet.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!
