On a lighter note, has anyone noticed the title of this thread? I be confused. --MM Jay Fenello wrote: > At 2/14/99, 05:18 PM, Jonathan Zittrain wrote: > >For what it's worth, ICANN's been pretty clear from the start that the > >initial board would be doing policy, too--this from the Nov. 14 meeting > >(I'd been thinking of "interim" and "initial" as interchangeable before this):
- [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous Jonathan Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous Milton Mueller
- [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerou... Bob Allisat
- [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerou... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dang... Bill Lovell