-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Becky Burr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Esther Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mike Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous
hello jay:
i would appreciate some further elightenment in light of your comments
below:
1.who do you believe has the "rights" to access to the IP data ? what is
your definition of "IPdata" ?
2.who do believe should be accrediting registrars and the development of
mechanisms to insure that they operate in "the best interest of the
internet" ?
3.should we have have a code of conduct for registrars ?
4.how do you feel we should insure that there is equity in situations where
the registry also competes at the registrar level ?
5.how do we insure "portability" so that domain name holders are assured
that they will be provided adequate information on alternatives available to
them for future registration servicing ?
best wishes
ken stubbs
>ICANN has greatly exceeded its mandate to deal with the
>NSI monopoly. It appears to have established an entire
>business model for all ICANN registrars, one that makes
>ICANN the owner of all IP data, and assesses a tax on
>all registrants without *any* checks and balances.
>
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Jay Fenello
>President, Iperdome, Inc.
>404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
>
>
