I encourage anyone who has not examined this powerful critique to do so.

Michael Froomkin - Public Interest Representative, WIPO Panel of Experts wrote:

> I have prepared a document entitled "A Critique of WIPO's RFC 3" which is
> available from http://www.law.miami.edu/~amf .
>
> I argue that WIPO's RFC 3, which contains extensive proposals for the
> prevention and resolution of disputes regarding domain name registrations
> in .com, .org and .net, is seriously flawed in its current form. Although
> I am a member of the Panel of Experts” that WIPO has established to advise
> it in this process, this document represents my personal views only,
> and the opinions expressed in it should not be attributed to WIPO or to
> any other member of the Experts Group.
>
> I'’d like to suggest that people interested in the future of the Internet
> take a look at RFC 3, and also my comments. I would urge interested
> parties to make comments to WIPO before the deadline.
>


Reply via email to