I encourage anyone who has not examined this powerful critique to do so. Michael Froomkin - Public Interest Representative, WIPO Panel of Experts wrote: > I have prepared a document entitled "A Critique of WIPO's RFC 3" which is > available from http://www.law.miami.edu/~amf . > > I argue that WIPO's RFC 3, which contains extensive proposals for the > prevention and resolution of disputes regarding domain name registrations > in .com, .org and .net, is seriously flawed in its current form. Although > I am a member of the Panel of Experts” that WIPO has established to advise > it in this process, this document represents my personal views only, > and the opinions expressed in it should not be attributed to WIPO or to > any other member of the Experts Group. > > I'’d like to suggest that people interested in the future of the Internet > take a look at RFC 3, and also my comments. I would urge interested > parties to make comments to WIPO before the deadline. >