If substantive discussion is only occuring on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list,
than the entire DNSO.org process and it's so called openness has just been a
big joke played on us by the CORE and Trademark interests.
On 07-Jan-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
> Milton Mueller a écrit:
>
>> No, what's really going on here is that the dnso.org is
>> attempting to cut a deal with the trademark interests.
>
> Milton-
>
> The other assertions you made in your posting may be true; I have no
> information one way or the other. But that the dnso.org per se is cutting
> deals can't be true, since the vast majority of the participants in the
> dnso.org have not been consulted. These people, who met in Barcelona and
> Monterrey, are subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but do not for
> the most part read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or the IFWP list. Since all the
> discussion about trademarks and membership are taking place on those two
> lists, the dnso.org participants are not privy to what's going on.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Jan-99
Time: 13:21:26
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
