I don't know what your problem is related to.
But I am resolving .cc domains here with no problem whatsoever.
I tested about 20 names using nameservers from West Coast US, East Coast US,
Brazil, Australia and Germany.
All were resolving just fine from all tested nameservers.
On 14-Mar-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Today is a gloomy day for "CC." domain holders.
>
> My sympathies lie with anyone using a CC. toplevel domain
> today (Sunday, March 14, 1999).
>
> The dns servers (two of them) for the toplevel domain "CC."
> are unreachable. Since both of their listed nameservers are
> on the SAME PIPE (*a real NO-NO as far as I know) the entire
> TLD is DEAD!
>
> I tested this from several routes, from NY, San Jose, and
> Amsterdam...all routes lead to nowhere.
>
> How can a TLD for an entire "country" (put aside the fact
> that the Cocos (Keeling) Islands has no human inhabitants)
> reside on a network that doesn't even have the minimun
> nameserver requirements (two servers on physically separate
> routes)?
>
> This raises some very valid questions on how this TLD
> was approved in the first place!
>
> regards,
>
> Paul Garrin
> President
> Name.Space, Inc.
> http://name.space
> http://name.space.xs2.net
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14-Mar-99
Time: 18:44:53
----------------------------------
"We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
- Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
