Roeland correctly evaluated the situation.
>Actually, those notes should have probably gone off-list, IMHO. So as not
>to bother the sensibilities of such as yourself. Also, yes there were a LOT
>of technical issues implied in the conversation, short as it was. That you
>don't recognise them speaks volumes about your actual understanding. Need I
>remind you that "jargon" does not appear without a need. The need is
>usually a human bandwidth requirement to transmit the maximum amount of
>conceptual information, using as much shared data as possible. The tongue
>of techo-speak, as it were. Without it, we wouldn't be able to get anything
>done, in the engineering trade. Step into any Information Technology
>department and you'll hear these types of conversations all the time.
>
Only problem the 10 year old is not farber but sondow for falling into such
a snit and lacking the maturity or inter presopnnal skills to understand
what a fool he makes of himself by his charcater assasination of farber.
I doubt that I am the only one who is tired of you.
IS THER ANY ONE willing and able to host this list and attach a civil
discourse requirement to it?
***************************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet What Happened to the White Paper?
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ICANN a Sham. (updated 10/25/98) See
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) http://www.cookreport.com/whorules.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Index to 6 years of COOK Report, how to
subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at http://www.cookreport.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
