At 6:04 AM -0500 1/13/99, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>At 12:01 AM 1/13/99 -0800, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>>
>>> Look at the DNSO propsal a la ORSC
>>> <http://www.dnso.net/library/dnso-orsc.proposal.shtml>
>>>
>>> To whit:
>>>
>>> >The Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO) shall be composed of any
>>> >individual, firm, association, corporation or other entity who is the
>>> >holder of a second level domain (SLD) in any top level domain (TLD)
>>> (Hereinafter "Domain
>>> >Name Holder").
>>
>>I'd suggest amending that to be ... "holder of one or more second level
>>domain(s) (SLD)..."
>
>Where in here does it not cover that case? I asked that question myself,
>when this came up in the ORSC list. This covers both COM/NET/ORG type TLDs
>and ccTLDs. Hmmm, it may be a bug. Mikki, can you check this? I seem to
>recall slightly different wording that covered the ccTLD case.
The ccTLD wording was discussed, but I don't think there was time to come
to consensus on the wording. The intent, of course, is not to excluse
anyone who holds a domain name in any gTLD or ccTLD (regardless of its
structure) and that regardless of how many domain names you hold, you get
one vote.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
