True, I forgot about foraminifera.com when I was busy registering
foraminfera.com <g>.
I trust I have made my not-so-subtle (or perhaps too subtle) point
that there are lots of domains left???  Just add creativity and stir
(not shake).

p.s. anyone who wants foraminfera.com is welcome to bid on it.  I have
to pay for those 1700 domregs soon.  <g>

"Martin B. Schwimmer" wrote:
> 
> And under NSI's rule about plurals, a registration for FORAMINIFER couldn't
> be used to invoke the dispute policy against foraminifera.com.
> 
> At 05:51 PM 4/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >I'll take 'em all <G>.
> >BTW, I can't believe extracellular.com and foraminfera.com weren't
> >already taken.  Make it so, number one.
> >
> >"Martin B. Schwimmer" wrote:
> >>
> >>  From Wired: "DOMAIN NAME LIST IS DWINDLING (TECH. 3:00 am)
> >>
> http://www.wired.com/news/news/email/explode-infobeat/technology/story/19117
> >> .html
> >>
> >>            A Wired News investigation found that the .com versions of
> >>            nearly all popular words have been taken. Of 25,500 standard
> >>            dictionary words we checked, only 1,760 were free. By
> >>            Declan McCullagh."
> >
> >--
> >Dan Steinberg
> >
> >SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> >35, du Ravin
> >Box 532, RR1           phone: (613) 794-5356
> >Chelsea, Quebec                fax:   (819) 827-4398
> >J0X 1N0                        e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >

-- 
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin
Box 532, RR1            phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec         fax:   (819) 827-4398
J0X 1N0                 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to