-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stef,
Don Telage brought up this issue. It is interesting that there are so
many issues that have been brought up by rather intelligent,
well-thought individuals, and the only one to get posted as an
additional issue is from Don Telage. Don has posted a letter (posted
one day after the ICANN deadline, by the way) which discusses this.
The URL is on the ICANN DNSO submissions page.
The issue is legit. How it is addressed is the question.
To date I have left Mr. Telage 5 messages asking him to discuss the
TLDA, NSI's approach to gTLD, etc. - issues we must be prepared to
address by Berlin. He has not had the professional courtesy to return
any of my calls.
I try to be as level-headed and non-confrontational as I can in these
issues. This is blatantly unprofessional.
Gene Marsh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Einar Stefferud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 1:51 PM
> To: Richard J. Sexton
> Cc: Joop Teernstra; Richard J Sexton; Marsh, Miles (Gene); Jay
Fenello
> Subject: Re: What does this mean about IDNO or TLDA?
>
>
> OK -- What does that mean to IDNO and TLDA, and to SuperRoot?
>
> I suppose I should go read the posted ICANN question;-)...\Stef
>
>
> From your message Tue, 18 May 1999 08:10:59 -0400 (EDT):
> }
> }It means they're buying tinto NSI's idea that cctld/gtld is
> wrong they should
> }be open or closed depending on who can register inthem.
> }
> }
> }At 10:08 PM 5/17/99 -0700, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> }>Specifically:
> }>
> }>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++
> }>+In addition, ICANN has posted a question requesting
> comment on a proposal to+
> }>+recategorize the DNSO constituencies for ccTLD registries
> and gTLD +
> }>+registries <http://www.icann.org/berlin/drafts2.html#1>
> +
> }>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++
> }>
> }>I have not yet read the cited web pages.
> }>
> }>Cheers...\Stef
> }>
> }>
> }>------- Forwarded Message
> }>
> }>From: Andrew McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> }>Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }>Subject: Reminder: Proposals for Public Comment in Advance
> of ICANN Berlin Meetings
> }>Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 18:58:55 -0400
> }>
> }>
> }>In advance of the ICANN meetings in Berlin on May 25-27, a number
of
> }>proposals, recommendations, and reports have been posted
> for public comment
> }>on the ICANN website in recent weeks. These items,
> together with the public
> }>comments received, will be discussed at a public forum in
> Berlin on May 26,
> }>1999. The ICANN board may consider taking action on these
> proposals at its
> }>meeting on May 27, 1999. ICANN actively encourages
> interested individuals
> }>and entities to review these documents and to forward
> comments to the email
> }>addresses set forth on the web page for each item.
> Comments received are
> }>automatically archived on the ICANN website for public review.
> }>
> }>Summary of items posted for public notice and comment:
> }>
> }>- - Proposals for recognition as ICANN Supporting Organizations
> }><http://www.icann.org/soapps3.htm>
> }>- - Proposals for Domain Name Supporting Organization
> Constituency Groups
> }><http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html>
> }>- - The World Intellectual Property Organization's "Final
> Report of the WIPO
> }>Internet Domain Name Process" <http://www.icann.org/wipo/wipo.htm>
> }>- - The ICANN Membership Advisory Committee has posted its
> preliminary
> }>recommendations for ICANN's membership structure
> }><http://www.icann.org/berlin/membership_rec.htm>
> }>- - The ICANN Advisory Committee on Independent Review has
> posted its
> }>preliminary recommendations for ICANN's independent review
mechanism
> }><http://www.icann.org/irac-interim-report.html>
> }>- - The proposed 1999-2000 ICANN transition budget
> }><http://www.icann.org/berlin/budget.html>
> }>- - A proposed interim policy on geographic diversity for
> the ICANN Board of
> }>Directors <http://www.icann.org/geo-diversity.html>
> }>
> }>In addition, ICANN has posted a question requesting comment
> on a proposal to
> }>recategorize the DNSO constituencies for ccTLD registries and gTLD
> }>registries <http://www.icann.org/berlin/drafts2.html#1>
> }>
> }>For further details on these proposals, please see
> }><http://www.icann.org/berlin/drafts2.html>. For details on
> the ICANN Berlin
> }>meetings, please see
<http://www.icann.org/berlin/berlin-details.html>.
}>
}>Best regards,
}>
}>- --Andrew McLaughlin
}>
}>
}>------- End of Forwarded Message
}>
}>
}--
}[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}"Those who give up a little freedom for a little security
}will not have, nor do they deserve, either one"
} --Thomas Jefferson
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBN0G+93KYiraY8fZCEQIAxQCgy+xYpSv1VDlEMLZ3mJL988xhKJEAn313
Dat8evGmctTPKRhb1zp6Yl4u
=v3J5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
