-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
...and the issue is not only "why were these other suggestions not
considered", but "what was the selection process for those who were
considered/chosen"?
Gene Marsh
interim secretary, TLDA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard J. Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Kent Crispin
> Subject: [IFWP] I though the underlying priciples were openness and
> transparency
>
>
> At 11:57 PM 5/20/99 -0800, Ellen Rony wrote:
> >Kent Crispin wrote:
> >>- the selection process was a distributed search -- nobody
involved
> >>knew all the players, or what everyone was doing
> >
> >I cut all the cc's. You can add 'em back if you want.
> >
> >After a summer of international meetings in 1998, people
> believed that the
> >selection of the interim NewCo board would be made by a
> PUBLIC process.
> >Indeed, names were suggested on this list, which was and
> remains the main
> >community dialogue about this self-organizing process. NSI had
some
> >recommendations, too, as did other organizations. None of
> those lists were
> >considered.
>
> Ellen's right. If the board was going to be hand picked
> by God knows who, why wern't we told?
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBN0WSGHKYiraY8fZCEQLAAgCgwoaZBh1cOCzxG5fLcGg1GntbIVQAnRlV
OtzqjRS8aRxvAkzPX1h3uS2N
=EOTs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
