At 12:00 PM 5/28/99 -0800, Ellen Rony wrote:
>Next, the July 31 deadline for the DNSO to submit Chapter 3 recommendations
>to ICANN is too ambitious for a new organization. The DNSO is still in
You can only meet an aggressive deadline if you set open.
While many people do not understand why there should be an aggressive
deadline, at all, others note the FIVE YEARS of delay in adding new gTLDs
and in creating competitive registries.
Many have note that pursuit the entire IANA/ICANN activity has been a very
successful ploy to delay creation of new gTLDs. Although IANA did/does
need to evolve, that evolution did not have to be in the critical path of
adding new gTLDs.
This deprives end-users of choice and aids the entrenchment of the current
monopoly gTLD provider.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
