>Take it from one who knows, Joop, and avoid Kent Crispin by whatever
>means available, including removing him from the list and/or
>ignoring his postings. He is a person with no morals, none
>whatsoever, and there is nothing he won't stoop to to disrupt and
>manipulate others, as was proved for all to see in the aftermath of
>the Monterrey DNSO meeting, when he rewrote the consensus proposal
>without the knowledge or agreement of the participants. Kent Crispin
>is an evil person, and he will use against them any benefit of the
>doubt you grant him.
>
Would Mr. Cook and Mr. Steinberg care to condemn this type of rhetoric or
is this further proof that the writer of the previous post has grown as a
person in the past six months and is now fit to represent non-commercial
domain holders everywhere?
