On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 19:30:54 -0400, "Kevin J. Connolly"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Dear Readers:
>
>As I am sure many of you are aware, there have been calls for one or more 
>constituencies that would embrace individuals as such.  These initiatives have sought 
>to confer upon interested individuals somewhat more say in domain name governance 
>than would be available under the rubric of the General Assembly.
>
>One of the more vocal proponents of that initiative has been an organization calling 
>itself, variously, the "Individual Domain Name Owners <something>", 
><http://www.idno.org> and "The Cyberspace Association."  A brief review of the 
>content of the website reveals some vague obeisance in the direction of "democracy."  
>One would expect as much.  After all, one of the buttons that we would expect the 
>IDNO's to push is the "Democracy is good" button.
>
>Don't be suckered-in by them.  They're about as democratic as the Central Committee 
>of the CPSU(b).  And I am their Leonid Trotsky :-)
>
>I was a co-founder of IDNO.  However, I was foolish enough to criticize several 
>aspects of its activities:
>
>     (A)  ICANN-bashing
>     (B)  ISOC-bashing
>     (C)  Threats made by a single individual to squelch the comments being made on 
>the IDNO mailing list by Dave Crocker and Kent Crispin.
>     (D)  Votebots launched at the whim of a single individual to remove Dave and 
>Kent from the mailing list.
>     (E)   NSI-sucking-up.
>
>The immediate result was that I was expelled from membership in IDNO.  No warnings.  
>No notice.  No voting.  Simply expelled by fiat of Joop Teemstra.

Now who is lying, Kevin?



--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:(209) 671-7934

The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.

Reply via email to