Jay,
You wrote:
> NSI has participate in the ICANN formation process,
> and frankly, they have put forward many good ideas
> (almost all of which have been ignored by ICANN).
>
> Case in point was the Paris Draft. That was a very
> good attempt to structure a bottom-up, consensus driven
> DNSO. Instead, we have a gerrymander DNSO that is nothing
> less than a sham.
>
I may be missing something, because I don't have the impression that the
current DNSO is dramatically different from what was foreseen in the Paris
Draft.
What exactly is the specific point of the Paris Draft that is so different
in the current DNSO to make you switch from a supporter of the process (I
assume that if the Paris Draft would have been accepted as the basis of the
DNSO by ICANN, you would have supported it) to an unconditional opponent
"tout-court" of ICANN.
This said, you know that I acknowledged during and after the Paris Draft
meeting that NSI had participated in a positive and proactive way to the
discussion, and I am curious to know what changed in NSI's camp as well to
make them revert to the attitude that was typical of the Battista times ;>)
Regards
Roberto
