Richard Sexton wrote:
> The one difference, and it's a *significant* difference, is, CORE would
> like to see only it's TLDS added to the root, whereas "our camp" would
> like to see CORES's and all the other ones added and the users
> can vote with it's wallets in a true free market.
>
What makes you say that CORE wants to see *only* its gTLDs added to the
root?
Can you point to a document (of CORE, not of some other fancy body) stating
this?
What CORE wants is to have a set of rules to add gTLDs, and these rules can
come out only from recommandations by DNSO/DNC and decisions by ICANN BoD.
Therefore, every delay in getting these bodies in operation is a delay in
the introduction of gTLDs.
CORE has no problem at all in acting as a Registry in competition with other
Registries (even if I have to confess that personally I am in favour of
non-profit Registries operating in the public trust - but then, if the
majority thinks in a different way, I'll accept it - that's life).
Regards
Roberto
