Jeff Williams wrote: > But [ICANN] can "Effectively" make it difficult for those > registries and their associated TLD's not to be "Seen" globally. That > constitutes an restraint of trade on the part of the ICANN by it's use > of policy and the DNS in general... As I (and others) have written before, there is no policy that restricts any ISP, IAP, or other interested (and knowledgable) party from taking their name service from other providers than the IANA roots. That they have decided not to do this seems to me to be one of the issues that ought to be discussed. --gregbo
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
