Kevin and all, A good point here with respect to the IDNO as it may indeed relate to the ICANN and the DNSO. But as you know Kelly, the NC/PNC amongst others of the ICANN (Initial?) interim Board, seem to believe that Individual Domain Name owners are more of a nuisance than they are collectively worth and might serve to upset their apple cart. Kevin M. Kelly wrote: > I'm about to collapse two point that Joop has made to highlight what I see > as the most salient feature of the IDNO: > > Joop Teernstra wrote: > > >Dear Mark, > > > >If you do not care to be classified either commercial or non-commercial, if > >you do not care to be put in a pro-NSI or an anti-NSI camp > >you are just the kind of ordinary Domain Name Owner the IDNO constituency > >was created for. > > > <snip> > > > >As an Association of Domain Name owners we will continue to exist and grow, > >with or without ICANN. > > With some pain, we have grow beyond a discussion of pro- & anti-NSI (Satan > or Savior--the truth is somewhere in between) into an organization that I > believe will persist with or with ICANN. The point being that is not a > group organized against anything. We are organized for the purpose of > protecting the rights and access of individuals to DNS. > > -- > This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send > a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/ Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
