I sent Javier email saying that I wanted to be on working group C.
He said that my "application" was accepted, and he'd let me know if
I was on it.
I then was contacted by an individual who said that he was just
told he's on the working group.
I then was contacted by a second individual who told me the same
thing, and that the working group was closed because there were
too many people for, as he put it, "meaningful progress."
I sent Javier email asking about this. No response for a week.
I re-sent my email.
Javier told me that nobody had been selected yet. This does not
agree with the two separate people I talked to who said they
were admitted. Javier mentioned that nobody would be
selected until the NC meeting. This, also, flew in the face of
what I'd been told by people who had been told they'd been
selected and that I had not.
I'm content to wait and see. The working group will be just
like the DNSO, anyway, I suspect.
--
Christopher Ambler
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
----- Original Message -----
From: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge.
Yes, I was going to ask this also, because from what I am hearing from
the meeting today, no one was refused.
This doesn't seem to jive with the facts.
So are those saying this in the meeting being disingenuous?
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999 02:04:57 +0200, Roberto Gaetano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Christopher,
>
>Am I understanding correctly, and you mean that you have been refused the
>possibility to join DNSO Working Group C on new gTLDs?
>If so, by whom and on which basis?
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Ambler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 6:08 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge.
>>
>> > In fact, we recognize the authority of ICANN, and we assume that, as
>> there
>> > are accredited Registrars, there will be accredited Registries, and
>> gTLDs
>> > will be allocated to these (accredited) Registries following a method
to
>> be
>> > determined.
>> > I assume that the DNSO will provide a recommendation in this sense. In
>> fact,
>> > a working group on new gTLDs is already being formed.
>>
>> A group for which I, as a representative of the longest-standing
>> prospective
>> registry, was told, at first, that my "application" would be considered,
>> and
>> then that my contribution was not necessary.
>>
>> The DNSO is a captured entity, whos results as passed on to ICANN will
>> be as predictable as the outcome of the IAHC process. And as similar.
>>
>> Christopher
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.
