Ellen Rony a �crit:
> 
> Ellen Rony and others say that if ICANN would open their
> >meetings there would be peace;
> 
> if ICANN would open their meetings, there would be process.  I don't know
> if there would be peace. But if it continues to make decisions barring
> public view, I feel quite certain there will be ongoing discord and lack of
> trust.

The DNSO is holding "open" meetings. Do you feel any more trust in
Javier Sola and the ISOC/CORE minions because of that? ICANN will
eventually hold open meetings, too, when they have either silenced
opposition or gotten strong enough to ignore it, if that happens. Is
a bad process any better because it's made available?

When open meetings were most important - in the beginning, to choose
leaders - they weren't open. Now it's too late.

Reply via email to