All,
<long sigh> Again more Willie Whining.... :(
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Is there any way to have the from field on non-member submissions be
> that of the original sender?
>
> This would help those of us who filter people like El.
>
> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:51:21 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Eberhard W Lisse
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> >>Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
> >>
> >>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 2 01:10:04 1999
> >>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Received: from elch.de.uu.net (elch.de.uu.net [192.76.144.55])
> >> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B8FF00C
> >> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
> >>Received: from ac.lisse.na (pec-9.au1.sb.uunet.de [149.228.12.9]:4728)
> >> by elch.de.uu.net with ESMTP (5.65+:003/3.0.2)
> >> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> id HAA26733; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:03:04 +0200 (MET DST)
> >>Received: from ac (ac [127.0.0.1])
> >> by ac.lisse.na (Postfix) with ESMTP
> >> id 44BA87A057; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [IFWP] AU turns ISPs into Netcops
> >>In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Jul 1999 20:55:19 GMT."
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>X-face:
>4/$83U}~dPclG58D@9ZT@f%R;U+U_|zEGWiJ;_O+Fp?qX}$i00hWYpU9iV-HlNx+E.|pZ|9|uk^*8rlfpj)B!=b`~{&$=0>;;.Qwj^M5n4E6ImH!5#gz.[;}4n8ZV%i.m!Z[T
> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 23:16:19 +0300
> >>From: Eberhard W Lisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>Willie,
> >>
> >>and you thought I had gone, eh?
> >>
> >>Why don't you do us all a favour and get lost?
> >>
> >>el
> >>
> >>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Willie whined:
> >>> On Thu, 01 Jul 1999 04:56:25 +0100, Jeff Williams
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >William and all,
> >>> >
> >>> > William, something you left out of your selection of Excerpts here
> >>> >is the amendment to the Australian bill regarding offensive content.
> >>> >I am providing it here for clarification purposes. It sort of puts this
> >>> >very good bill in it's proper perspective.
> >>> >
> >>> >"For instance, a last-minute amendment to the
> >>> > law called for "recognized alternative
> >>> > access-prevention arrangements." The
> >>> > association lobbied heavily for the amendment,
> >>> > which could give ISPs a way to satisfy their
> >>> > legal obligations by offering their subscribers
> >>> > filtering software, or by offering different levels
> >>> >of
> >>> > commercial service based on varying amounts of
> >>> > content filtering at the ISP level, Coroneos said.
> >>> > How this would work in practice has yet to be
> >>> > defined. "
> >>> >
> >>> > So as everyone can see clearly this law is not all that bad in
> >>> >reality, although a bit unecessary...
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> *sigh* you also leave out the part where they say that this may end
> >>> up not being acceptable to the board who will oversee this, and that
> >>> this is just a loose interpretation.
> >>>
> >>> So why don't you try putting yourself into "proper perspective."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> William X. Walsh
> >>> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> >>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
> >>>
> >>> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
> >>> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."=20
> >>> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> William X. Walsh
> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
