>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Bill Lovell
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:43:03 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 2 16:43:02 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from mail.europa.com (glum.europa.com [209.20.130.164])
> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D51F00A
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from cerebral (ip101.r1.d.pdx.nwlink.com [207.202.136.101])
> by mail.europa.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA18926
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1
>Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 13:42:20 -0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Bill Lovell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [IFWP] refreshing contact details
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <Your message of "Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:21:22 -0400">
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>At 02:25 PM 6/28/99 +0200, you wrote:
>>> >Neither does France allow individuals to register in .fr. These two
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> France put out an interesting announcement last week allowing
>>> individuals to register. They're instituting COM.FR as a
>>> domain where anyone can register anything. It's effectively
>>> a new French gTLD.
>>
>>Norway has a similar policy - no individuals directly under .no but priv.no
>>can be used. I believe Sweden also has a similar policy.
>>
>>Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>Not to advocate this, but an obvious extension would be for the U.S.
>to have such a domain: there's your defined individual domain name
>holder constituency. (Whether the parallel should be extended to
>put all us real people under a .us domain is another question.) The
>resultant domain would, of course, be a retreat from the internet by
>all those who were the original users, and an abandonmenent to the
>commercial interests.
>
>Bill Lovell
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
