At 09:03 PM 7/10/99 GMT, you wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:41:08 -0700, Dave Crocker
>Its simple, ICANN should not be charging a $1/domain fee at all.
>ICANN needs to charge for services it actually renders. No service
>that ICANN provides is tied to the quantity of second level domains.
>
>
I'm not convinced ICANN should OR should not receive $1/domain. I just
don't see it being a FEE. I certainly have yet to see what value ICANN
would provide for that $1, given their current course.
IF ICANN were providing the level of value you expect from a coordinating
entity, would you have a problem with that $1?
But then, your expectation of the desired delivered value might be quite
different than mine.
>
>--
>William X. Walsh
>General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
>"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
>characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
>--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
>
>
Gene Marsh
++++++++++
Gene Marsh
Rogue network propeller-head
