> Since nobody but NC members can participate in the Names Council
> teleconf.
Are they really being so stupid as to hold yet another closed meeting?
Of course that would be a violation of the ICANN bylaws that require open
meetings "to the maximum extent".
There is *NOTHING* that they can be talking about that requires a closed
session. The names council has no personel matters to discuss, no
contracts being negotiated.
> If they expect any feeling of legitimacy whatsoever from the GA
How about from anybody?
Closed meetings are an insult to all of us, a violation of the organic
documents, and fly in the face of NTIA's letter to Congressman Bliley.
--karl--
