Hi.

The message you sent was referring to the discussion in the afternoon, when
clearance was given to sign the PSO MoU.

What I added was that, later on in the evening, the MoU has been physically
signed (which was a piece of information that was not known at the time the
afternoon's message was written).

Regards
Roberto

P.S.: Maybe I'm not good at reading headers, but OTOH I read the body of the
messages before replying ;>)


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 16 July 1999 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] [Fwd: Poisson status]


Roberto and all,

  That is why I sent it Wed. Afternoon, Roberto.  Can you read headers
by any chance?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> >   This might be of some interest...  FYI
> >
> If you want the follow-up, yes, the PSO MoU was signed yesterday night
(Oslo
> time).
>
> Regards
> Roberto

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


Reply via email to