On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 04:32:58PM -0700, Bill Lovell wrote: > For the benefit of dumb butt here, what's the IP size of the new IPv6 thing? > (Did I get that right?) It's not a "dotted quad," I take it, so what is > it? And > its capacity is 2 to the what? 128 bits vs 32 bits for IPv4. That's 340282366920938463463374607431768211456 vs 4294967296 addresses, if I did the arithmetic correctly... Or 56713727820156410577229101238 addresses for every human on earth, give or take a few. -- Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Martin Burack
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jim Dixon
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams