>
> FYI: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-39935,00.html?st.ne.140.head
>
>Very interesting. A change in ICANN strategy with respect to
>Liability perhaps????
>
This has nothing to do with ICANN and everything with trying to exploit a
privately owned substitute for an open DNS.
Centraal and RealNames *will* need a costly liability shield. That will
keep their fees up. TANSTAAFL.
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org