Mr. Walsh and Everyone,
I don't believe nor can I find any specific restriction with respect to
proxie. Can you provide documentation to this effect, Mr. Walsh?
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Sunday, August 22, 1999, 8:38:23 AM, Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kent and all,
>
> > I would strongly disagree with Kent and Jonathan's tally as presented
> > by Jonathan in his post, http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01037.html
> > to which Kent refers. I do so as I have the proxies of all of our [INEGroup]
> > members, and I voted for them, per their request, for option 2 with
> > an amendment to the wording and posted that to the IFWP, Domain Policy
> > WG-C mailing list as such. Hence I contend that Jonathan either did not
> > recognize this fact, or ignored it. I will be happy to reproduce or copy
> > our post with our vote to that extent should clarification be required
> > or requested....
>
> There is no proxy participation in the Working Groups, and you are
> well aware of this fact. The working group list is restricted to
> posts only from members of that list, and is not a general comment
> list accepting postings from everyone. This is a Good Thing(tm).
>
> --
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
> Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
>
> (IDNO MEMBER)
> Support the Cyberspace Association, the
> constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
> http://www.idno.org
Respectfully,
--
Brian C. Hollingsworth
Sr. Legal Advisor, International House of Justice Internet
Communications Affairs and Policy
Advisory council for Public Affairs and Internet Policy, European
Union
