Wednesday, August 25, 1999, 6:40:30 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> To what cause, Jeff? To obstruct the process by disruption?
>>
>> > No - the bigger picture - he has the right to belong.
>>
>> To join in and participate, yes, to disrupt and sabotage? No.
> If Jeff were the only one here sabatoging then hurray. There are many
> more. The question I see is can we overlook it and move on. Why don't
> you filter JeffW.
Yes, I know you are actively in support of efforts to sabatoge, but
don't expect others to support it. As Mark so correctly points out,
with the right to participate comes responsibility.
Participation is a civil medium, and there are certain things that
participants have a right to expect from one another.
As to the rest of your post, I will avoid the response that appiles
the same analysis to your own propensity to support Jeff's activities
and the motivation behind them. Up until this point you have not
crossed the line Jeff as.
I would suggest that if it bothers you so much, you stop trying to
stick up for him. You do not do much for your cause in doing so,
except associate your support of Jeff's activities with your own
efforts, something that will only further degrade their credibility.
You only make our points more salient when you respond to them,
because they end up getting made with even more clarity and
conciseness.
I notice you carefully avoid the salient points made about the reasons
why his activities are inappropriate. You know perfectly well there
is no justification for them.
--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org
