Russ and all, Well yes in part, or at least they espoused to be.... It appears, this is not the case. No surprise there though. Self regulation either via contract or otherwise only WORKS when the regulators have the ability and mandate to enforce the regulations they espouse to, which ICANN doesn't, and they have the consent of the industry, again, which ICANN doesn't. Given that, ICANN is impotent and not much more than a "Club". Nothing wrong with that, but to espouse to be otherwise, goes to creditability... domainiac wrote: > >According to Mike Roberts each registrar decided to incorporate the > revocation > >language into their contracts on their own, although clearly the Registrar > >Accreditation Agreement requires language that facilitates revocation. > > Isn't the whole point of ICANN to make sure this stuff doesn't happen? > > Russ Smith > http://domainia.org Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
