once again you just don't get it. personal opinions and business don't
mix. france has been trying to get rid of this guy for some time, and
it's stuff like this that gives them good reason.
A registrar who can not give answer will become incresingly irrelevant.
Pity.
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Poor Joe, can't get anyone to take him seriously....
>
>
>
> On 01-Dec-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here's an email exchange i've recently had with some cctld guy. I have
> > no
> > idea who this man is - but obviously i've had some imapct in his life.
> >
> > I just hope he gets the nics web site up some day. That would be nice.
> >
> > Regards
> > Joe baptista
> >
> > P.S. I'm posting this as an example of icann/iana stupidity. if a
> > registrar can't answer a question without personal comment - i'm sorry -
> > but they have failed in their job.
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:43:36 -0500 (EST)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: John Charles Broomfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Confirmation of your ccTLD registry information
> >
> > OK - i've looked into your record. From what I can see you do the
> > cctld's
> > for Guadeloupe and Martinique. From what I can see the only change
> > required in your record is to include a url for Guadeloupe which is
> > located at http://www.nic.gp/. I suggest you look up that url and the
> > one
> > at http://www.nic.mq/. Both open up into an empty directory tree. Very
> > unprofessional. I won't bother attempting to find a whois server at
> > this
> > time. From what I can see your under construction.
> >
> > I'm not surprised your sites are such a mess. If you technical skills
> > are
> > based on the same professional business skills you have displayed in our
> > email exchange - it's obvious to me your still in the process of
> > evolution.
> >
> > Enjoy
> > Joe Baptista
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, John Charles Broomfield wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I didn't take kindly to your "official bind survey". This looks like
> >> > part II
> >>
> >> What do you mean by official. Also your opinion is not of interest to
> >> me.
> >> Get on with the business of confirming my information - or get lost.
> >>
> >> This email exchange is part of the public record, and if it's you
> >> intent
> >> to show me you can't do you job, then so be it - it's not my
> >> department.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> joe baptista
> >>
> >> >
> >> > > what do you mean - why. You are a registrar and i need to know if
> >> > > the
> >> > > information is correct. do you have a problem with this position.
> >> >
> >> > I have a problem with you and your attitude in general.
> >> >
> >> > > alot of iana's information is incorrect or outdated. So once again
> >> > > -
> >> > > could you kindly let me know if what I sent you is correct or
> >> > > incorrect.
> >> > >
> >> > > regards
> >> > > joe baptista
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, John Charles Broomfield wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Please review the information and provide me with any
> >> > > > > corrections. I'm
> >> > > > > specifically interested in confirming your registries web URL
> >> > > > > and whois
> >> > > > > server (if any).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Why?
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
