"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Saying that "the Registry would be of no help unless there is evidence of a
> violation of the Regigtry/Registrar Agreement" does not mean that I think
> that is a problem.
Chuck:
Fair enough, how about if I quote you as saying (for completness,
inserting the text you classified as "this situation"):
"I agree with you that the Registry would be of no help in this situation
[namely, the facts that the Registrar follows a sales system (Shared
Registry) that denies tracing the Registry for any customer, denies
responsibility to the customer from the Registry, denies access to the
Registry's logs in order to prove customer's rights, keeps the
property of what is sold with the reseller, gives the customer no
authority over what was bought, and denies legal recourse as the
customer may see fit] unless there is evidence of a violation of the
Registry-Registrar agreement. However, I do not think this is a
problem." Chuck Gomes.
Is this according to what you want to say? If not, please provide
the change, if yes then I can comment by return email.
Cheers,
Ed Gerck
