http://www.mediachannel.org/originals/cronkite.shtml

Walter Cronkite On The Media

Good evening, I'm Walter Cronkite. I really wanted to be with you in person 
tonight for Globalvision New Media's launch of the new Internet site the 
Media Channel, but unfortunately I was called out of the country. Yet the 
issues that led to the creation of this unique global resource, and the 
crisis that's facing all of us who work in and care about journalism and 
the media, are so profound that I simply felt compelled to tape this 
message so that you would know that I am with you in spirit at least.

As you know, I've been increasingly and publicly critical of the direction 
that journalism has taken of late, and of the impact on democratic 
discourse and principles. Like you, I'm deeply concerned about the merger 
mania that has swept our industry, diluting standards, dumbing down the 
news, and making the bottom line sometimes seem like the only line. It 
isn't and it shouldn't be.

At the same time, I'm impressed that so many other serious and concerned 
people around the world are also becoming interested in holding media 
companies accountable and upholding the highest standards of journalism.

The Media Channel will undoubtedly be worth watching and taking part in. I 
am intrigued by its potential, and its global reach. The idea that so many 
leading groups and individuals around the whole world have come together to 
share resources and information about a wide range of media concerns is 
very promising, and I urge you to make the Media Channel your media 
'bookmark' and your portal to the Internet.

I'm particularly excited about one aspect of the Media's Channel's work: 
its encouragement to people inside the media to speak up�to speak out about 
their own experiences. Corporate censorship is just as dangerous as 
government censorship, you know, and self-censorship can be the most 
insidious form of pulling punches. Pressures to go along, to get along, or 
to place the needs of advertisers or companies above the public's need for 
reliable information distort a free press and threaten democracy itself.

I'm pleased that the Media Channel opens an immediately available resource 
for media whistle-blowers. Anonymity will be protected, of course�if their 
stories check out, of course. And, of course, are backed up with the facts.

We have all been supportive for years of dissidents around the world who 
take great risks to stand up for what they believe in. But here at home, in 
our own industry, we need to make it possible for people to speak out when 
they feel they've been wronged, even if it means shaming newsrooms to do 
the right thing. Journalists shouldn't have to check their consciences at 
the door when they go to work for a media company. It ought to be just the 
reverse.

As I've said on other occasions, the strength of the American system is 
possible and can be nurtured only if there is lively and provocative 
dissent. In a healthy environment dissent is encouraged and considered 
essential to feed a cross-fertilization of ideas and thwart the incestuous 
growth of stultifying uniformity.

We need to encourage and support those among us who face either overt or 
covert threats�or even a more subtle absence of encouragement to search out 
the truth. We all know that economic pressures and insecurities within news 
organizations have reduced the scope and range of investigative reporting. 
Sometimes projects are spiked with just a simple phrase: "It's not for us."

We're always ready to speak out when journalists are at risk. But today we 
must speak out because journalism itself is at risk. That's why I'm 
speaking out and reaching out to you tonight, to tell you that I like the 
idea of the Media Channel and want to encourage your participation. And 
that's the way it is.
Respectfully,

Jay Fenello,
New Media Relations
------------------------------------
http://www.fenello.com  770-392-9480
Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World
------------------------------------------------------
"We are creating the most significant new jurisdiction
we've known since the Louisiana purchase, yet we are
building it just outside the constitution's review."
   --  Larry Lessig, Harvard Law School, on ICANN

Reply via email to