> This isn't funny, you know. Many people, myself included, worked > very hard to present proposals for a reorganization of .us that > would preserve it for public interest use, as it was intended. For the record, the original intent of the .us domain included commercial use. See RFC 1480. (Incidentally, for those following the "older registrations" thread on the DNSO GA list, this RFC makes some statements on who was authorized to add new TLDs.) --gregbo
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control of root is materi... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control of root is m... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control of root ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control of r... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government con... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: US DOC: government control of root is m... Greg Skinner