I meant industry flak; flak like we all have given NSI. I understood that
GA didn't uphold it's end of the Agreement went quietly into the good night
rarely to be spoken of again. At least NSI stayed the course.
>>
>>
>>It has always been surprising to me that General Atomics and ATT, who were
>>part of the initial InterNIC, received no flack for notholding up their
>>portion of the Cooperative Agreement. Maybe ATT did some work but their
>>Annual Report of, I believe 1996 didn't even mention that role.
Gordon Cook wrote:
>
>Ellen ...general atomics was terminated ....they were cancelled a
>year early....first time DNCRI office of NSF ever did that to an
>awardee....
>I certainly consider early termination of an award flak
>
>AT&T's performance was considered acceptable.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Ellen Rony // http://www.domainhandbook.com
Co-author *=" ____ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Domain Name Handbook \ ) +1 415.435.5010
// \\ "Carpe canine"
The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
